AMD Radeon Pro W5700X versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1855 MHz versus 1815 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 versus 716
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 versus 15835
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1855 MHz versus 1815 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 versus 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 versus 716 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 versus 15835 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1243 MHz
- Environ 3% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 205 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 43810
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 16573
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 16573
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 1243 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 205 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 43810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 16573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 16573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3714 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 105171 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 716 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 15835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | Q3'2020 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 157 | 156 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1855 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1243 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.9 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 12 inches (305 mm) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5700X avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon 760M
