AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 29% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1605 MHz
Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1770 MHz
Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 936 vs 885
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19881 vs 18252
Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 99847

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 Jun 2021 vs 2 July 2019
Core clock speed	2075 MHz vs 1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	2507 MHz vs 1770 MHz
Pipelines	3840 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	936 vs 885
PassMark - G3D Mark	19881 vs 18252
Geekbench - OpenCL	131707 vs 99847

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

2.1x lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 450 Watt
7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 20988
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 20988

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	215 Watt vs 450 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	25232 vs 20988
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	25232 vs 20988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

936

885

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

19881

18252

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20988

25232

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20988

25232

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3359

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

131707

99847

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W6800	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark	936	885
PassMark - G3D Mark	19881	18252
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20988	25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20988	25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3359
Geekbench - OpenCL	131707	99847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1438.826
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		7

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W6800	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 21	TU104
Launch date	8 Jun 2021	2 July 2019
Launch price (MSRP)	$2249	$499
Place in performance rating	108	133
Type		Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2507 MHz	1770 MHz
Compute units	60
Core clock speed	2075 MHz	1605 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1203 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	38.51 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	19.25 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3840	2560
Pixel fill rate	240.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	601.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	450 Watt	215 Watt
Transistor count	26800 million	13.6 B
CUDA cores		2560
Maximum GPU temperature		88 C
Render output units		64
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port		1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Height	50 mm (2 inches)	4.556” (115.7mm)
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm (10.5 inches)	10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	850 Watt	650 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	6 pin + 8 pin
Width	120 mm (4.7 inches)	2-Slot
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.1
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Technologies
Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready