AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1605 MHz
  • Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1770 MHz
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 900
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19199 vs 18161
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 vs 2 July 2019
Core clock speed 2075 MHz vs 1605 MHz
Boost clock speed 2507 MHz vs 1770 MHz
Pipelines 3840 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 999 vs 900
PassMark - G3D Mark 19199 vs 18161

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 450 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 20988
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 20988
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 215 Watt vs 450 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25232 vs 20988
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25232 vs 20988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
999
900
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19199
18161
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20988
25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20988
25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3359
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6800 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark 999 900
PassMark - G3D Mark 19199 18161
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20988 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20988 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3359
Geekbench - OpenCL 97465
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1438.826
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Code name Navi 21 TU104
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 2 July 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $2249 $499
Place in performance rating 47 46
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2507 MHz 1770 MHz
Compute units 60
Core clock speed 2075 MHz 1605 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 1203 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 19.25 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3840 2560
Pixel fill rate 240.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 601.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 450 Watt 215 Watt
Transistor count 26800 million 13.6 B
CUDA cores 2560
Maximum GPU temperature 88 C
Render output units 64

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 6x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Height 50 mm (2 inches) 4.556” (115.7mm)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches) 10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt 650 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 6 pin + 8 pin
Width 120 mm (4.7 inches) 2-Slot

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready