AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 601.7 GTexel/s vs 532.8 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s vs 532.8 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- 2.7x more pipelines: 10240 vs 3840
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 450 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 921
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 vs 19952
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 20988
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 20988
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 131707
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 10240 vs 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt vs 450 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 921 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 vs 19952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 20988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 20988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 131707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 1088 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19952 | 26935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 34770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 34770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | 209081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 21 | GA102 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | $1199 |
Place in performance rating | 113 | 60 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | 34.10 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3840 | 10240 |
Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | 186.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | 532.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 912.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |