AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 793
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19832 vs 18692
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20988 vs 19571
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20988 vs 19571
- Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 74179
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 793 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19832 vs 18692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 vs 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 vs 19571 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 vs 74179 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 450 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 450 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 793 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19832 | 18692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | $6,299 |
| Place in performance rating | 116 | 115 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800S
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
