NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro W6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 3840
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 450 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26506 vs 20988
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26506 vs 20988
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 450 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 vs 20988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 vs 20988 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1575 MHz
- Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 601.7 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 616
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19832 vs 16109
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 113467
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 616 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19832 vs 16109 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 vs 113467 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 | 20988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 | 20988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 616 | 921 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16109 | 19832 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 113467 | 131707 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Navi 21 |
Place in performance rating | 118 | 116 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 2507 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 2075 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 604.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS (1:1) | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS | 19.25 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 151.2 GPixel/s | 240.7 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | 601.7 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 450 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |