AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1975 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- 3447.3x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 137.5 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2786 vs 2443
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2786 vs 2443
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2243 vs 1674
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2243 vs 1674
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 125290 vs 33724
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 4 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 137.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 vs 1674 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 vs 33724 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 1674 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 | 33724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 835 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 4 August 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | $549.99 |
Place in performance rating | 502 | 504 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 926 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 137.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | 450 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Quad-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 6600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |