AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 80 nm
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 80 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 400 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 113306 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 79 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Navi 21 | C78 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 17 April 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | |
Place in performance rating | 526 | 524 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 80 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | |
Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |