AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs AMD Radeon RX 560
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and AMD Radeon RX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1090-1175 MHz
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 1975 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 81.60 GTexel/s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113306 vs 57671
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 18 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1090-1175 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 81.60 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 113306 vs 57671 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 60-80 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 2786
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 2786
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2243
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2243
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 vs 2786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 vs 2786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 3352 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 113306 | 57671 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3645 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon RX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 18 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | $99 |
Place in performance rating | 526 | 529 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Price now | $104.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | 1200-1275 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | 14/16 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1090-1175 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | 20.40 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 60-80 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 3,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 170 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | 450 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Quad-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |