AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
2.3x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 773 MHz
5896.3x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
2.3x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1664
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113306 vs 18372

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 Aug 2021 vs 29 June 2015
Core clock speed	1800 MHz vs 773 MHz
Texture fill rate	474.0 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3840 vs 1664
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	113306 vs 18372

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000

3.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 400 Watt
3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2786
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2786
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2243
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2243

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt vs 400 Watt
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 2786
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 2786
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332 vs 2243
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332 vs 2243

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2786

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2786

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2243

3332

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2243

3332

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

113306

18372

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2786	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2786	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2243	3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2243	3332
Geekbench - OpenCL	113306	18372
PassMark - G3D Mark		6673
PassMark - G2D Mark		673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		65.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		732.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		17.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		217.357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		6291
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2302

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 21	GM204
Launch date	3 Aug 2021	29 June 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$4999	$791
Place in performance rating	526	523
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Price now		$765.93
Value for money (0-100)		10.68
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1975 MHz
Compute units	60
Core clock speed	1800 MHz	773 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	948.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	30.34 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	15.17 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3840	1664
Pixel fill rate	189.6 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	474.0 GTexel/s	80.39 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	400 Watt	120 Watt
Transistor count	26800 million	5,200 million
Floating-point performance		2,573 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm (10.5 inches)	241 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	800 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Width	Quad-slot	1" (2.5 cm)
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12.2	12
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management