AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 6x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1975 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- 6x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
- 5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 10 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 8.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113306 vs 13654
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 31 Oct 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 10 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 113306 vs 13654 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- 16x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 2786
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 2786
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 2243
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 2243
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 2786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 2786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 2243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 2243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 3214 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 113306 | 13654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Generation 12.1 |
Code name | Navi 21 | DG1 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 31 Oct 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | |
Place in performance rating | 526 | 527 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3840 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | 39.60 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 79.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Quad-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 68.26 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR4X |