AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 667 MHz
  • 2.6x more boost clock speed: 1975 MHz vs 771 MHz
  • 3202.7x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 148.0 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
  • 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113306 vs 18340
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 Aug 2021 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed 1800 MHz vs 667 MHz
Boost clock speed 1975 MHz vs 771 MHz
Texture fill rate 474.0 GTexel/s vs 148.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3840 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 113306 vs 18340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200

  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 400 Watt
  • 3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 2786
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 2786
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2243
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2243
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 400 Watt
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708 vs 2786
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708 vs 2786
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 2243
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 2243

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2786
3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2786
3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2243
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2243
3353
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
113306
18340
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo NVIDIA Quadro K5200
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2786 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2786 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2243 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2243 3353
Geekbench - OpenCL 113306 18340
PassMark - G3D Mark 6030
PassMark - G2D Mark 531
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 47.147
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1278.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 50.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 115.307
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5946
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5946

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Kepler
Code name Navi 21 GK110B
Launch date 3 Aug 2021 22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP) $4999 $1,699.74
Place in performance rating 531 534
Type Workstation Workstation
Price now $523.66
Value for money (0-100) 14.51

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1975 MHz 771 MHz
Compute units 60
Core clock speed 1800 MHz 667 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 15.17 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3840 2304
Pixel fill rate 189.6 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 474.0 GTexel/s 148.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 400 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 26800 million 7,080 million
Floating-point performance 3,553 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches) 267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 800 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Width Quad-slot

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5