AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD FirePro W4300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 11155.9x more texture fill rate: 498.0 GTexel/s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 11.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 124439 vs 11008
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 1 December 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 498.0 GTexel/s vs 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 124439 vs 11008 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3723
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3723
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3360
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3360
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 vs 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 vs 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X | AMD FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 6161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 6161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 17597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 17597 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 124439 | 11008 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2820 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.528 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.986 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.153 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 152.484 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3572 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3572 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800X | AMD FirePro W4300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 1 December 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 426 | 427 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2075 MHz | |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 996.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 31.87 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.94 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 199.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 498.0 GTexel/s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 171 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 560v
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
AMDFirePro W7170M
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
AMDFirePro W4300
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
AMDRadeon Pro V340 MxGPU
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
AppleM1 8-core
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
AppleM1 7-core
