AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
797.7x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
800x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14219 vs 11526
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 26.532
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3329
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3329

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 18 February 2014
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	14219 vs 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111 vs 26.532
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2398
Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 411
Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 25.896
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 486.804
Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.503
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 100.658
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2524
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3274
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2524
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3274

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 925 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901 vs 2398
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.463 vs 25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	642.715 vs 486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.933 vs 2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	133.458 vs 100.658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4843 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4843 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 3274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2398

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

411

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14219

11526

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.896

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

486.804

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.503

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

53.111

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

100.658

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3329

Name	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	2398	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	411	521
Geekbench - OpenCL	14219	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.896	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	486.804	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.503	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	100.658	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		117

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Polaris	Maxwell
Code name	Lexa	GM107
Launch date	27 May 2019	18 February 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$149
Place in performance rating	841	707
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1082 MHz	1085 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz	1020 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	86.56 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	17.31 GPixel/s
Stream Processors	640
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,389 gflops
Pipelines		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	Half Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	6.6" (168 mm)	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA