AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 811 MHz
• Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 797 MHz
• 543x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 63.76 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 341
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14062 vs 8652
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.503 vs 2.486
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 42.15
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 100.658 vs 87.659
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3331
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3331

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2794 vs 2415
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.528 vs 25.896
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 731.755 vs 486.804
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 2524
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 3274
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 2524
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 3274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2415 2794
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	415 341
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14062 8652
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.896 29.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	486.804 731.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.503 2.486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 42.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.658 87.659
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3331

Compare specifications (specs)