AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 1072 MHz
1089.4x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2048x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 307
Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14042 vs 8849
Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 42.938

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 18 August 2015
Boost clock speed	1082 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	415 vs 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	14042 vs 8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111 vs 42.938

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Around 7% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2847 vs 2415
Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 25.896
Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 486.804
Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 2.503
Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 100.658
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 2524
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3274
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 2524
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3274

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 925 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 65 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2847 vs 2415
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33 vs 25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18 vs 486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 vs 2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 vs 100.658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2415

2847

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

415

307

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14042

8849

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.896

38.33

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

486.804

721.18

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.503

3.056

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

53.111

42.938

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

100.658

137.786

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3358

Name	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2415	2847
PassMark - G2D Mark	415	307
Geekbench - OpenCL	14042	8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.896	38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	486.804	721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.503	3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111	42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	100.658	137.786
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Essentials
Architecture	Polaris	Maxwell
Code name	Lexa	GM107
Launch date	27 May 2019	18 August 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$200.89
Place in performance rating	849	851
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Price now		$203.37
Value for money (0-100)		16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1082 MHz	1072 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz	993 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	86.56 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	17.31 GPixel/s
Stream Processors	640
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s	31.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	40 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,017 gflops
Pipelines		512
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	Half Height
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	6.6" (168 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB / 4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus