AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs ATI FirePro M7740
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and ATI FirePro M7740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- 3x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 832.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 77% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3384 MHz
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3654 vs 665
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 415
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 4 August 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 832.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 3384 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3654 vs 665 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 vs 415 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro M7740
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2678
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2678
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2678 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: ATI FirePro M7740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | ATI FirePro M7740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3654 | 665 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 415 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 | 3309 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | ATI FirePro M7740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Baffin | M97 |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 4 August 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 604 | 601 |
Price now | $259.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 832.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 20.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 54.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3384 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |