AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W5170M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD FirePro W5170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1053 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- Around 59% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,184 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2615 vs 1767
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 371
- 5.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 9198
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3355
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 25 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops vs 1,184 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2615 vs 1767 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 vs 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 vs 9198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5170M
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3409 vs 3301
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3189 vs 2086
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3409 vs 3301
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3189 vs 2086
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3409 vs 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3189 vs 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3409 vs 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3189 vs 2086 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5170M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD FirePro W5170M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2615 | 1767 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | 9198 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 3189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 3189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD FirePro W5170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Tropo |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 25 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 671 | 672 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s | 37 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |