AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 7 March 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 58.97 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
- Around 52% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,887 gflops
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.802 vs 46.158
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.769 vs 876.241
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.68 vs 64.599
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 370.179 vs 194.258
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 89.6 GTexel / s vs 58.97 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 1,887 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.802 vs 46.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.769 vs 876.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.68 vs 64.599 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 370.179 vs 194.258 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2615 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | 67.802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | 1230.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | 81.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | 370.179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Baffin | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 7 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 671 | 668 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 240.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X1550
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
