AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 450 MHz
  • 6.6x more texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
  • 2.2x more pipelines: 896 vs 400
  • 5.2x better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2615 vs 632
  • 9.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 5257
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3339
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3339
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 March 2017 vs 7 January 2012
Core clock speed 1002 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate 58.97 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
Pipelines 896 vs 400
Floating-point performance 1,887 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2615 vs 632
Geekbench - OpenCL 51217 vs 5257
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6466 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6466 vs 3339

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M

  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 411
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2632 vs 2086
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2632 vs 2086
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 479 vs 411
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2632 vs 2086
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2632 vs 2086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7610M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2615
632
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
411
479
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
51217
5257
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2086
2632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6466
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2086
2632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6466
3339
Name AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile AMD Radeon HD 7610M
PassMark - G3D Mark 2615 632
PassMark - G2D Mark 411 479
Geekbench - OpenCL 51217 5257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 876.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 64.599
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 194.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2086 2632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6466 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2086 2632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6466 3339

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile AMD Radeon HD 7610M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Baffin Whistler
Launch date 1 March 2017 7 January 2012
Place in performance rating 670 671
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1053 MHz
Core clock speed 1002 MHz 450 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,887 gflops 360.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 896 400
Texture fill rate 58.97 GTexel / s 9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 716 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.0 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0