AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 6.6x more texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 896 vs 400
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2615 vs 632
- 9.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 5257
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3339
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 7 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops vs 360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2615 vs 632 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 vs 5257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 411
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2632 vs 2086
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2632 vs 2086
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2632 vs 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2632 vs 2086 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7610M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2615 | 632 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | 5257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Baffin | Whistler |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 670 | 671 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | 360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |