AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 6990
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 6990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 830 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.158 vs 17.264
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 vs 840.452
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.983 vs 1.76
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 vs 53.903
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3356
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 8 March 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 830 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 vs 17.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 vs 840.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 vs 1.76 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 vs 53.903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 58.97 GTexel / s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 896
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 1,887 gflops
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3014 vs 2642
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 408
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 265.302 vs 194.258
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4562 vs 3301
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2086
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4562 vs 3301
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2086
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 58.97 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 1,887 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3014 vs 2642 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 vs 194.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4562 vs 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4562 vs 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 2086 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 6990 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2642 | 3014 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 | 532 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | 17.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | 840.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | 1.76 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | 53.903 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | 265.302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | 4562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | 4562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Baffin | Antilles |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 8 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 671 | 673 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 830 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | 2x 2,549.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 2x 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,640 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 295 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |