AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 6990

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 6990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 830 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 375 Watt
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.158 vs 17.264
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 vs 840.452
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.983 vs 1.76
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 vs 53.903
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3356
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990

• 4.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 58.97 GTexel / s
• 3.4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 896
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 1,887 gflops
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3014 vs 2615
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 411
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 265.302 vs 194.258
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4562 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2086
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4562 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2615 3014
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	411 532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.158 17.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	876.241 840.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.983 1.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.599 53.903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.258 265.302
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 4562
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 4562
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3356

Compare specifications (specs)