AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile versus AMD Radeon HD 6990
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 6990 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1002 MHz versus 830 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 7.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 375 Watt
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.158 versus 17.264
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 versus 840.452
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.983 versus 1.76
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 versus 53.903
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 versus 3356
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2017 versus 8 March 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1002 MHz versus 830 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 versus 17.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 versus 840.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 versus 1.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 versus 53.903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6990
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 58.97 GTexel / s
- 3.4x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 896
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,549.8 gflops versus 1,887 gflops
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3014 versus 2642
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 408
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 265.302 versus 194.258
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4562 versus 3301
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 2086
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4562 versus 3301
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 2086
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 58.97 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,549.8 gflops versus 1,887 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3014 versus 2642 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 408 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 versus 194.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4562 versus 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4562 versus 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 2086 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2642 | 3014 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | 17.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | 840.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | 1.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | 53.903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | 265.302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Nom de code | Baffin | Antilles |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2017 | 8 March 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 671 | 673 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1053 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1002 MHz | 830 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,887 gflops | 2x 2,549.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2x 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.97 GTexel / s | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,640 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 295 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2x 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.0 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X1550
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 120 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
