AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7870M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- Around 84% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2528 vs 1507
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2086 vs 1367
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3359
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2086 vs 1367
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops vs 1,024 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2528 vs 1507 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 vs 1367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 vs 1367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870M
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 556 vs 420
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 556 vs 420 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2528 | 1507 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | 556 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 1367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 1367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Baffin | Heathrow |
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 24 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 649 | 575 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s | 32 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 120 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT500 Mobile
