AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 9.2x more texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 7.5x more pipelines: 896 vs 120
- 9.8x better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2200 MHz
- 8.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2528 vs 283
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 420 vs 371
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 1701
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 28 June 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 120 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops vs 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2528 vs 283 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 1701 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 2086
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 2086
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 2086 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2528 | 283 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 1701 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Baffin | RV630 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 28 June 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 649 | 646 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 120 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 390 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 120 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT500 Mobile
