AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec
• Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
• Around 19% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 244 Watt
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
• 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 15124
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.158 vs 40.048
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 vs 32.378
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.258 vs 132.363
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3357
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

• Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 1002 MHz
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4612 vs 2659
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 410
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.338 vs 3.983
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2086
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2659 4612
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	410 482
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	51217 15124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.158 40.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	876.241 872.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.983 4.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.599 32.378
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.258 132.363
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 5953
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 5953
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3357

Compare specifications (specs)