AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs AMD FirePro W5100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5489 vs 2978
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 531
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25596 vs 11724
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.861 vs 35.15
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1362.14 vs 838.518
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.025 vs 3.199
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 106.141 vs 57.354
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 250.267 vs 163.258
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5579 vs 4397
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5579 vs 4397

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 713 MHz
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 1691
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1565
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 1691
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1565

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5489 2978
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	772 531
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	25596 11724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.861 35.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1362.14 838.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.025 3.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	106.141 57.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	250.267 163.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5579 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1691 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1565 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5579 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1691 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1565 3356

Compare specifications (specs)