AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 30% higher core clock speed: 713 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • 55.3x more texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
  • 224x more pipelines: 1792 vs 8
  • 173.8x better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
  • 4.2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • 59.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5552 vs 93
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 334
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 November 2016 vs 15 August 2008
Core clock speed 713 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate 121.6 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1792 vs 8
Floating-point performance 3,892 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5552 vs 93
PassMark - G2D Mark 772 vs 334

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

  • 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5552
93
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
772
334
Name AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
PassMark - G3D Mark 5552 93
PassMark - G2D Mark 772 334
Geekbench - OpenCL 25596
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 87.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1362.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 106.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 250.267
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1565
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1565

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Tesla
Code name Ellesmere G98
Launch date 18 November 2016 15 August 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $499
Place in performance rating 482 485
Price now $349.99
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 19.34

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1086 MHz
Core clock speed 713 MHz 550 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,892 gflops 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 1792 8
Texture fill rate 121.6 GTexel / s 2.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-II
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 9.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 1200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0