NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 713 MHz
Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6337 vs 5579
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6337 vs 5579
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1691
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1691
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1565
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1565

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 18 November 2016
Core clock speed	1025 MHz vs 713 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337 vs 5579
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337 vs 5579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 1691
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 1691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 1565
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 1565

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
Around 85% better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 778 vs 381
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5582 vs 4289
Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25596 vs 16429

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	121.6 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 vs 1024
Floating-point performance	3,892 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	778 vs 381
PassMark - G3D Mark	5582 vs 4289
Geekbench - OpenCL	25596 vs 16429

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

381

778

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4289

5582

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

16429

25596

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

5579

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6337

5579

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

1691

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

1691

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

1565

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

1565

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
PassMark - G2D Mark	381	778
PassMark - G3D Mark	4289	5582
Geekbench - OpenCL	16429	25596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337	5579
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337	5579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	1691
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	1691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	1565
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	1565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		87.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1362.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		106.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		250.267

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Code name	GM206	Ellesmere
Launch date	11 January 2017	18 November 2016
Place in performance rating	469	470
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$499
Price now		$349.99
Value for money (0-100)		19.34
Technical info
Core clock speed	1025 MHz	713 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,099 gflops	3,892 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	1024	1792
Texture fill rate	65.6 GTexel / s	121.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	5,700 million
Boost clock speed		1086 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	88 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5