AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3575
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 10 November 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- Around 57% better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 3,656 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7826 vs 6573
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 774
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38923 vs 27107
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10320 vs 8931
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10320 vs 8931
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 114.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 3,656 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7826 vs 6573 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 vs 774 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38923 vs 27107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10320 vs 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10320 vs 8931 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6573 | 7826 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | 800 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27107 | 38923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8931 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8931 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.834 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 22 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 10 November 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 332 | 329 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Price now | $539.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.25 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | 5,728 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s | 179.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 224.0 GB / s |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |