AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 21 June 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16988 vs 13932
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1086 vs 815
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16988 vs 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1086 vs 815 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 | 16988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | 1086 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Volta |
Code name | Vega 10 | GV100 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 21 June 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 118 | 23 |
Price now | $999 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 21,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1700 MHz |