AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon RX Vega XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 193.8x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel/s vs 417.3 GTexel / s
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 8 August 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s vs 417.3 GTexel / s |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1630 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- 3.2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 931 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1630 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 1280 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon RX Vega XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4769 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 196748 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon RX Vega XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 22 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 8 August 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 301 | 30 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1630 MHz |
| Compute performance | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 161.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 32.35 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s | 417.3 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5000 million | |
| Floating-point performance | 13,353 gflops | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
