AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.121 vs 13.097
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 vs 1811
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 vs 1811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 6.4 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 204.8 gflops vs 179.2 gflops
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 341 vs 250
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 99 vs 67
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 7324
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.721 vs 2.751
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.613 vs 93.854
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.445 vs 0.263
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 vs 6.299
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 701 vs 375
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1338 vs 1282
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 701 vs 375
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1338 vs 1282

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	250 341
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	67 99
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7324 8386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.751 4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	93.854 107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.263 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.299 10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.121 13.097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	375 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1282 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1912 1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	375 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1282 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1912 1811

Compare specifications (specs)