AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7324 vs 2262

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 February 2015 vs 14 May 2011
Pipelines	128 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	7324 vs 2262

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

2x more texture fill rate: 11.2 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
Around 50% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 179.2 gflops
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 668 vs 250
3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 238 vs 67
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.698 vs 2.751
Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 175.385 vs 93.854
Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.497 vs 0.263
Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.27 vs 6.299
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1064 vs 375
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1589 vs 1282
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1912
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1064 vs 375
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1589 vs 1282
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1912

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	11.2 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops vs 179.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	668 vs 250
PassMark - G2D Mark	238 vs 67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.698 vs 2.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	175.385 vs 93.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.497 vs 0.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.27 vs 6.299
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1064 vs 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1589 vs 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2716 vs 1912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1064 vs 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1589 vs 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2716 vs 1912

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

250

668

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

238

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7324

2262

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.751

5.698

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

93.854

175.385

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.263

0.497

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.299

9.27

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

375

1064

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1282

1589

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1912

2716

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

375

1064

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1282

1589

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1912

2716

Name	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	250	668
PassMark - G2D Mark	67	238
Geekbench - OpenCL	7324	2262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.751	5.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	93.854	175.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.263	0.497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	6.299	9.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	375	1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1282	1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1912	2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	375	1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1282	1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1912	2716

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi
Code name	Beema	GF108
Launch date	27 February 2015	14 May 2011
Place in performance rating	1589	1361
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	700 MHz	700 MHz
Floating-point performance	179.2 gflops	268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	128	96
Texture fill rate	5.6 GTexel / s	11.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	930 million	585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		145 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz