AMD Radeon R3 Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8250

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R3 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 8250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 600 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 306 vs 212
  • Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 59
  • Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1502 vs 1075
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 587 vs 384
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 750 vs 628
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1745 vs 1343
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 587 vs 384
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 750 vs 628
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1745 vs 1343
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 January 2015 vs 1 June 2013
Boost clock speed 600 MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 306 vs 212
PassMark - G2D Mark 94 vs 59
Geekbench - OpenCL 1502 vs 1075
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 587 vs 384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 750 vs 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1745 vs 1343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 587 vs 384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 750 vs 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1745 vs 1343

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8250

  • Around 12% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 267 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz vs 267 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8250

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
306
212
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
94
59
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1502
1075
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
587
384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
750
628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1745
1343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
587
384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
750
628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1745
1343
Name AMD Radeon R3 Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8250
PassMark - G3D Mark 306 212
PassMark - G2D Mark 94 59
Geekbench - OpenCL 1502 1075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.343
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 106.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.35
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 21.88
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 587 384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 750 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1745 1343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 587 384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 750 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1745 1343

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R3 Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8250

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 GCN
Code name Beema Temash
Launch date 28 January 2015 1 June 2013
Place in performance rating 1618 1620
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 600 MHz 400 MHz
Core clock speed 267 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 153.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 128 128
Texture fill rate 4.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 930 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11.1
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Memory type System Shared
Shared memory 1