AMD Radeon R3 Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R3 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 8250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 306 vs 212
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 59
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1502 vs 1075
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 587 vs 384
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 750 vs 628
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1745 vs 1343
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 587 vs 384
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 750 vs 628
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1745 vs 1343
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 1 June 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 306 vs 212 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 vs 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1502 vs 1075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 587 vs 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 750 vs 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1745 vs 1343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 587 vs 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 750 vs 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1745 vs 1343 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8250
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 267 MHz
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 267 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 306 | 212 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1502 | 1075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.343 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 106.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.35 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.234 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.88 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 587 | 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 750 | 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1745 | 1343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 587 | 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 750 | 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1745 | 1343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | Beema | Temash |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 1 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1618 | 1620 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | 400 MHz |
Core clock speed | 267 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 153.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 930 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | |
Shared memory | 1 |