Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD Radeon R3 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and AMD Radeon R3 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 750 MHz vs 600 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 306
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.529 vs 3.343
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.495 vs 0.35
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 750
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 750

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics

• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 267 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 10.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 12
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 93
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1502 vs 995
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 106.771 vs 75.815
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.234 vs 8.178
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.88 vs 11.584
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 587 vs 476
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1745 vs 1701
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 587 vs 476
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1745 vs 1701

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	320 306
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	93 94
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 1502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.529 3.343
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.815 106.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.495 0.35
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.178 8.234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.584 21.88
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 587
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 750
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 587
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 750
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1745

Compare specifications (specs)