AMD Radeon R4 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 6.4 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 128 vs 16
- 6.1x better floating-point performance: 204.8 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 15.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 538
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 vs 7.36
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.097 vs 12.009
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 14 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.4 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 204.8 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 vs 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 vs 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.097 vs 12.009 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 342
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 99
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 4.721
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 107.613
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.445
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 701
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1338
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1811
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 701
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1338
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1811
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 342 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 vs 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 vs 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 vs 0.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 1811 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 342 | 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 | 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.721 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.613 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.097 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 701 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1811 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 701 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1811 | 2392 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Beema | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1540 | 1501 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 204.8 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 6.4 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 1,200 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |