AMD Radeon R4 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 23% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 6.4 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
  • 8x more pipelines: 128 vs 16
  • 6.1x better floating-point performance: 204.8 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 15.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 538
  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 vs 7.36
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.097 vs 12.009
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 June 2014 vs 14 May 2012
Core clock speed 800 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 6.4 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 128 vs 16
Floating-point performance 204.8 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 8386 vs 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.612 vs 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 13.097 vs 12.009

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 342
  • Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 99
  • Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 4.721
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 107.613
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.445
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 701
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1338
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1811
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 701
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1338
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1811
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 347 vs 342
PassMark - G2D Mark 194 vs 99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.712 vs 4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 155.638 vs 107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.931 vs 0.445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 754 vs 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1492 vs 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2392 vs 1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 754 vs 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1492 vs 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2392 vs 1811

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
342
347
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
99
194
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8386
538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.721
8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
107.613
155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.445
0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.612
7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13.097
12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
701
754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1338
1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1811
2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
701
754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1338
1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1811
2392
Name AMD Radeon R4 Graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark 342 347
PassMark - G2D Mark 99 194
Geekbench - OpenCL 8386 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.721 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 107.613 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.445 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.612 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 13.097 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 701 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1338 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1811 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 701 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1338 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1811 2392
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R4 Graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Generation 7.0
Code name Beema Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date 11 June 2014 14 May 2012
Place in performance rating 1540 1501
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 800 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 204.8 gflops 33.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 128 16
Texture fill rate 6.4 GTexel / s 4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 930 million 1,200 million
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 1.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.0

Memory

Memory type System Shared
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync