AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 80 vs 20
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 104.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2761 vs 2143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 3 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops vs 46 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2761 vs 2143 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 110
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 148
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 337
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 337
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 583
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 583
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 1094
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 1094
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 vs 110 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 vs 148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 vs 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 vs 1094 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 | 275 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | 524 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2761 | 2143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 337 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 337 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 583 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 583 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1094 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1094 | 3044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Cedar | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 3 September 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1592 | 1421 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 46 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 392 million |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8.528 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |