AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 86% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 80 vs 20
  • 2.3x better floating-point performance: 104.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
  • Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
  • Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2761 vs 2143
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 December 2013 vs 3 September 2013
Core clock speed 650 MHz vs 350 MHz
Texture fill rate 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 80 vs 20
Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2761 vs 2143

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 110
  • 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 148
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 337
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 337
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 583
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 583
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 1094
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 1094
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 275 vs 110
PassMark - G3D Mark 524 vs 148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 817 vs 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 817 vs 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1381 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1381 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3044 vs 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3044 vs 1094

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
110
275
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
148
524
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2761
2143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337
817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337
817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
583
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
583
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1094
3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1094
3044
Name AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G2D Mark 110 275
PassMark - G3D Mark 148 524
Geekbench - OpenCL 2761 2143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 337 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 337 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 583 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 583 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1094 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1094 3044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 8.335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 152

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM Intel HD Graphics 4400

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Generation 7.5
Code name Cedar Haswell GT2
Launch date 21 December 2013 3 September 2013
Place in performance rating 1592 1421
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 650 MHz 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 46 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 80 20
Texture fill rate 5.2 GTexel / s 4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 292 million 392 million
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.4 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 8.528 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1066 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync