AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1681 vs 1439
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1681 vs 1439
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 15 February 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1681 vs 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1681 vs 1439 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750
- 5.1x more texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 512 vs 160
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 vs 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1681 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1681 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3295 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1693 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 305 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 305 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Caicos | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 15 February 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1127 | 1128 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $149.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 1,500 million |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon E6760
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 310 OEM
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465
