AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 320 vs 160
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 548 vs 289
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 152
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 790
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 540
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1284 vs 1044
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2264 vs 1702
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 540
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 vs 1044
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 vs 1702
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs 5 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 548 vs 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4936 vs 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 vs 1702 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 548 | 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4936 | 790 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.668 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 | 1702 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Oland | Caicos |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1406 | 1491 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 27 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |