AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD FirePro V5900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM and AMD FirePro V5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 355
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 24 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 vs 355 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 512 vs 160
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 614.4 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1265 vs 332
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2880 vs 770
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.167 vs 2.002
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 409.102 vs 110.092
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.772 vs 0.228
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.064 vs 5.678
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.259 vs 23.621
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 614.4 gflops vs 248.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1265 vs 332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2880 vs 770 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.167 vs 2.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 409.102 vs 110.092 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.772 vs 0.228 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.064 vs 5.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.259 vs 23.621 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V5900
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM | AMD FirePro V5900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 | 355 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 332 | 1265 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 770 | 2880 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.002 | 8.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 110.092 | 409.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.228 | 0.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.678 | 20.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.621 | 66.259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2091 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5078 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2091 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5078 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM | AMD FirePro V5900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Caicos | Cayman |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 24 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1095 | 1098 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 248.0 gflops | 614.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 6.2 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 2,640 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 230 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |