AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 271
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2380 vs 2188
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2380 vs 2188
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3289
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3289
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 271 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3289 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 39.72 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,271 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2593 vs 935
- Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10220 vs 5635
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1973 vs 1935
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1973 vs 1935
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2593 vs 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10220 vs 5635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1973 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1973 vs 1935 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 271 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 935 | 2593 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 | 10220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3289 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Oland | GM107 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 892 | 894 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 993 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 914 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 1,271 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 39.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |