AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 22% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 600 MHz
3.9x more texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 120
4.2x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 144 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
4.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 935 vs 211
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1693
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1693

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 28 June 2007
Core clock speed	730 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 120
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops vs 144 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	338 vs 337
PassMark - G3D Mark	935 vs 211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 1693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 1693

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

338

337

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

935

211

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

1693

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

1693

Name	AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM	ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
PassMark - G2D Mark	338	337
PassMark - G3D Mark	935	211
Geekbench - OpenCL	5635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2380
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	1693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	1693

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM	ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale
Code name	Oland	RV630
Launch date	5 May 2015	28 June 2007
Place in performance rating	892	889
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	780 MHz
Core clock speed	730 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops	144 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	384	120
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s	4.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	390 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	73.6 GB / s	16 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2