AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
  • 3.2x more pipelines: 256 vs 80
  • 3.7x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
  • Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2981 vs 2761
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 337
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 583
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1094
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 337
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 583
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1094
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 31 May 2016 vs 21 December 2013
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 256 vs 80
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2981 vs 2761
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 vs 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1363 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1915 vs 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 vs 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1363 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1915 vs 1094

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed 650 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2981
2761
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1363
583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1915
1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1363
583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1915
1094
Name AMD Radeon R5 Graphics AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL 2981 2761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 119.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.459
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1363 583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1915 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1363 583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1915 1094
PassMark - G2D Mark 110
PassMark - G3D Mark 148

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Wani Cedar
Launch date 31 May 2016 21 December 2013
Place in performance rating 1551 1592
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 256 80
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s 5.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 19 Watt
Transistor count 2,410 million 292 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 8.528 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1066 MHz