AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 256 vs 80
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2981 vs 2761
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 337
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 583
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1094
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 337
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 583
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1094
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 21 December 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 vs 2761 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 vs 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 1094 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 2761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1094 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Wani | Cedar |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1551 | 1592 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8.528 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz |