AMD Radeon R5 M230 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M230 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• 2.4x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 3.7x more texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 320 vs 20
• 11.9x better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 46 gflops
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 vs 2143
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.593 vs 7.844
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 vs 9.084
• 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 vs 8.335
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 985 vs 817
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 1381
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 985 vs 817
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 1381

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 855 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 417
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 128
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 154.696 vs 143.386
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.852
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2401
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2401

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M230
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	417 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	128 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4596 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.593 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.386 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.852 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.789 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.196 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	985 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1927 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2401 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	985 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1927 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2401 3044

Compare specifications (specs)