AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M240 and AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 875 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 320 vs 160
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 280.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 458 vs 263
- 8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6975 vs 872
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1444 vs 1078
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1444 vs 1078
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3249 vs 2093
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3249 vs 2093
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 881 vs 672
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 881 vs 672
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 September 2014 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 875 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 280.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 458 vs 263 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6975 vs 872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1444 vs 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1444 vs 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3249 vs 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3249 vs 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 881 vs 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 881 vs 672 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 150
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 150 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M240 | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 458 | 263 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6975 | 872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1444 | 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1444 | 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3249 | 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3249 | 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 881 | 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 881 | 672 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.021 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M240 | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Jet | Caicos |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 18 September 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1298 | 1541 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 875 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 280.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 7 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 370 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory type | Not Listed | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |