AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M240 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 550 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 320 vs 128
• Around 87% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 352.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 88

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

• Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3315 vs 3249
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3315 vs 3249

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M240
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	458 456
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	150 88
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3249 3315
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3249 3315

Compare specifications (specs)