AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs NVIDIA GeForce 615

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M240 and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 660 MHz
  • 3.9x more texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
  • 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
  • 5.2x better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3721 vs 1322
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1444 vs 1286
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1444 vs 1286
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3249 vs 1708
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3249 vs 1708
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 881 vs 668
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 881 vs 668
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 September 2014 vs 15 May 2012
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 660 MHz
Texture fill rate 20.6 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines 320 vs 48
Floating-point performance 659.2 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 3721 vs 1322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1444 vs 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1444 vs 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3249 vs 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3249 vs 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 881 vs 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 881 vs 668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615

  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 514 vs 451
  • Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 156
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 514 vs 451
PassMark - G2D Mark 301 vs 156

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
451
514
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
156
301
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3721
1322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1444
1286
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1444
1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3249
1708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3249
1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
881
668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
881
668
Name AMD Radeon R5 M240 NVIDIA GeForce 615
PassMark - G3D Mark 451 514
PassMark - G2D Mark 156 301
Geekbench - OpenCL 3721 1322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1444 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1444 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3249 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3249 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 881 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 881 668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.257

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 M240 NVIDIA GeForce 615

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Jet GF108
Design AMD Radeon R5 200 Series
Launch date 18 September 2014 15 May 2012
Place in performance rating 1310 1313
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 1000 MHz 660 MHz
Floating-point performance 659.2 gflops 126.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 320 48
Texture fill rate 20.6 GTexel / s 5.28 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 585 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 49 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support Not Listed
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16

API support

DirectX 11 12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory type Not Listed DDR3
Shared memory 0
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
HD3D
Powerplay
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore