AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs NVIDIA GeForce 615
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M240 and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 660 MHz
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3721 vs 1322
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1444 vs 1286
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1444 vs 1286
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3249 vs 1708
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3249 vs 1708
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 881 vs 668
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 881 vs 668
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 September 2014 vs 15 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 126.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3721 vs 1322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1444 vs 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1444 vs 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3249 vs 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3249 vs 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 881 vs 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 881 vs 668 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 514 vs 451
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 156
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 514 vs 451 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 vs 156 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M240 | NVIDIA GeForce 615 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 451 | 514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 156 | 301 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3721 | 1322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1444 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1444 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3249 | 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3249 | 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 881 | 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 881 | 668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.257 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M240 | NVIDIA GeForce 615 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Jet | GF108 |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 18 September 2014 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1310 | 1313 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 660 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 126.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 5.28 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory type | Not Listed | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |