AMD Radeon R5 M315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R5 M315

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 48% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 657 MHz
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2761 vs 2728
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2761 vs 2728

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 30 May 2013
Core clock speed	970 MHz vs 657 MHz
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2761 vs 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2761 vs 2728

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
Around 35% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 745.0 gflops
2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1717 vs 474
Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 166
Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5567 vs 3573
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 780
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 780

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 320
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops vs 745.0 gflops
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1717 vs 474
PassMark - G2D Mark	232 vs 166
Geekbench - OpenCL	5567 vs 3573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2836 vs 780
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2836 vs 780

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M315
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

474

1717

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

166

232

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3573

5567

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

780

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

780

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2761

2728

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2761

2728

Name	AMD Radeon R5 M315	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
PassMark - G3D Mark	474	1717
PassMark - G2D Mark	166	232
Geekbench - OpenCL	3573	5567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	780	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	780	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2761	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2761	2728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		53.992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 M315	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Kepler
Code name	Meso	GK106
Design	AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date	5 May 2015	30 May 2013
Place in performance rating	1118	1120
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Compute units	5
Core clock speed	970 MHz	657 MHz
Floating-point performance	745.0 gflops	1,009 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	768
Texture fill rate	23.28 GTexel / s	42.05 GTexel / s
Transistor count	3,100 million	2,540 million
Boost clock speed		657 MHz
CUDA cores		768
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		55 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size		large
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12	12 API
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA