AMD Radeon R5 M315 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 23.28 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 745.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 5 October 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 970 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 23.28 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 745.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 974 vs 474
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 166
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3921 vs 3573
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1453 vs 780
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1453 vs 780
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3447 vs 2761
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3447 vs 2761
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 974 vs 474 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 vs 166 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3921 vs 3573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 vs 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 vs 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 vs 2761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 vs 2761 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M315
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M315 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 474 | 974 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 166 | 326 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3573 | 3921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 780 | 1453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 780 | 1453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2761 | 3447 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2761 | 3447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M315 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Meso | GF106 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 October 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1118 | 1121 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $209 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 970 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 745.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 23.28 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,170 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 41.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M315 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M315 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D
AMDRadeon R5 M315 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M
AMDRadeon R5 M315 vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
AMDRadeon R5 M315 vs
AMDRadeon R5 330 OEM
AMDRadeon R5 M315 vs
AMDFirePro W5130M
AMDRadeon R5 M315 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
