AMD Radeon R5 M320 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M320 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R5 M320

Intel HD Graphics 4400

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M320

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
2.2x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 350 MHz
3.7x more texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 320 vs 20
11.9x better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 46 gflops
Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.564 vs 7.844
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1202 vs 817
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1202 vs 817
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5002 vs 2143

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 3 September 2013
Core clock speed	780 MHz vs 350 MHz
Texture fill rate	17.1 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	320 vs 20
Floating-point performance	547.2 gflops vs 46 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.564 vs 7.844
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1202 vs 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1202 vs 817
Geekbench - OpenCL	5002 vs 2143

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 855 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 467
Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 140

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 855 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	524 vs 467
PassMark - G2D Mark	275 vs 140

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M320
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

467

524

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

140

275

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.564

7.844

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1202

817

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1202

817

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5002

2143

Name	AMD Radeon R5 M320	Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark	467	524
PassMark - G2D Mark	140	275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.564	7.844
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1202	817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1202	817
Geekbench - OpenCL	5002	2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		152

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 M320	Intel HD Graphics 4400
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Jet	Haswell GT2
Design	AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date	5 May 2015	3 September 2013
Place in performance rating	1402	1421
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	855 MHz	1150 MHz
Compute units	5
Core clock speed	780 MHz	350 MHz
Floating-point performance	547.2 gflops	46 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	320	20
Texture fill rate	17.1 GTexel / s	4.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	392 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		20 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	16 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
Quick Sync