AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs Intel HD Graphics 520
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and Intel HD Graphics 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 209
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4743 vs 3993
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 951
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 951
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 209 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4743 vs 3993 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 vs 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 vs 951 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 549
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 14.536
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.083 vs 120.354
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1114
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1716
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1114
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1716
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 vs 549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 vs 14.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 vs 120.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 vs 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 vs 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 1716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | Intel HD Graphics 520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 549 | 864 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 209 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4743 | 3993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 | 143.083 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1716 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1716 | 3337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M335 | Intel HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Exo | Skylake GT2 |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1045 | 1381 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 5 | |
Core clock speed | 1070 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Quick Sync |