AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs Intel HD Graphics 520

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and Intel HD Graphics 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • 3.6x more core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 209
  • Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4743 vs 3993
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 951
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 951
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 October 2015 vs 1 September 2015
Core clock speed 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1070 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 577 vs 209
Geekbench - OpenCL 4743 vs 3993
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1080 vs 951
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1080 vs 951

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 549
  • Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 14.536
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.083 vs 120.354
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1114
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1716
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1114
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1716
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 864 vs 549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 21.852 vs 14.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 143.083 vs 120.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1462 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3337 vs 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1462 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3337 vs 1716

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 520

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
549
864
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
577
209
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4743
3993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.536
21.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
120.354
143.083
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1080
951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1114
1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1716
3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1080
951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1114
1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1716
3337
Name AMD Radeon R5 M335 Intel HD Graphics 520
PassMark - G3D Mark 549 864
PassMark - G2D Mark 577 209
Geekbench - OpenCL 4743 3993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.536 21.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 120.354 143.083
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1080 951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1114 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1716 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1080 951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1114 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1716 3337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 28.182
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 326

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 M335 Intel HD Graphics 520

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Generation 9.0
Code name Exo Skylake GT2
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date 21 October 2015 1 September 2015
Place in performance rating 1045 1381
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1070 MHz 1050 MHz
Compute units 5
Core clock speed 1070 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 684.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 320 24
Texture fill rate 21.4 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 189 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_1)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
Quick Sync